In case you were starting to have any doubts, here’s more proof that the New York Times is nothing more than a filthy liberal rag.
After the horrific massacre on French satire newspaper Charlie Hebdo, at the hands of radical Muslims, the New York Times publicly promised to never again publish pictures of the prophet Muhamad because it tends to incite mass violence from so many Muslims.Here’s what the Times’ no Muhammed policy says:
“Under Times standards, we do not normally publish images or other material deliberately intended to offend religious sensibilities. After careful consideration, Times editors decided that describing the cartoons in question would give readers sufficient information to understand today’s story.”
It’s unclear but fairly safe to assume that the New York Times had been living up to the standards of their own ridiculous policy of not publishing what it deems offensive literature of religious figures. That is until the Times published a piece of crap picture that depicts Pope Benedict XV made entirely out of condoms.
Here’s the piece of “art” that the Times decided was “fit to print”:
To be clear, the New York Times didn’t want to print a truly harmless and completely unoffensive picture of Muhammad holding a sign but it was willing to print the filth you see above:
I guess it’s just going to take thousands and thousands of Catholics cutting off heads and massacring innocent people before weak-minded liberals, like the editors at the Times, get the message that they can’t pick and chose which religion is and isn’t okay to disrespect.
Send this to a friend