• EPA Imposed Yellow River Of Secrecy In Mining Disaster

    Federal officials required the contractor in the Gold King Mine Spill to sign a secrecy pledge that keeps the public in the dark about a Colorado mining disaster earlier this year that turned waters yellow as they flowed through two states and the Navajo Nation.

    The Environmental Protection Agency required Missouri-based Environmental Restoration LLC , which was responsible for the spill of three million gallons of mining waste into Cement Creek, a tributary of the Animas River, to sign what is known in federal procurement regulations as a non-disclosure agreement.

    While NDAs often protect important government secrets, such agreements can also obstruct official accountability at critical times.

    As a result, important details about the Aug. 5, 2015, environmental disaster near Silverton, Colorado, remain hidden nearly three months later. Taxpayers wouldn’t even know the identity of the firm but for reporting by the Wall Street Journal that was based on a leak from an anonymous EPA official.

    The spill occurred while an EPA official and company personnel were working at the site and sent a flood of mining waste, including toxic materials like cadmium, lead and arsenic, into the water sources for people living in Colorado, Utah and New Mexico, as well as the Navajo Nation.

    “With few exemptions, the public’s business should be done publicly, not privately,” said Open The Books founder Adam Andrzejewski. “After a major spill, the EPA’s worst practices are coming to light – shrouding the public business in privacy.”

    Andrzejewski has been seeking EPA documents about the disaster for months, beginning September 10. The EPA responded more than a month later, saying there were 28 contracts with Environmental Restoration and it would take until Dec. 22, 2015, “to review contract [sic] to determine the contract pertaining to the Colorado site.”

    In other words, Andrzejewski said, “the EPA is forestalling transparency regarding a toxic spill that threatened the regional drinking supply of the American Southwest. The EPA isn’t answering our requests on a timely basis and the contractor is relying on their non-disclosure agreement to remain silent.”

    Open The Books has published billions of bytes of spending data for federal and state governments. The group’s guiding principle is “Every dime. Online. In Real Time.”

    Environmental Restoration is not just any EPA contractor. The firm describes itself on its web site as “the largest provider of emergency response services” to the agency.

    “Each of our EPA contracts … has specific language requiring ER’s confidentiality on all site matters,” Environmental Restoration President and Managing Partner Dennis Greaney said on the site. “ER honors our contractual confidentiality obligations to all of our clients, and cannot provide any additional information.”

    In other words, according to Andrzejewski said, “the ‘most transparent’ administration in history is signing their largest contractors to hush agreements.”

    Meanwhile, EPA has only released a few relevant documents.

    “The EPA’s release of contracts and other data has assisted the public in understanding the government’s actions, but there is a need for more answers,” the Project on Government Oversight said after the disaster.

    “The public release of additional information and details will enhance the ongoing investigations and allow the government to learn from its mistakes rather than hiding the truth from policymakers and the public,” the group said. POGO is a non-profit government watchdog.

    The EPA’s inspector general announced Thursday it would broaden its investigation to include seeking “details on the work the EPA was conducting at the Gold King Mine prior to the spill” and “the expertise of the EPA employees and contractors carrying out that work.”

    “The contracts were public and there might have been a reason to not talk about certain issues until the EPA had a better understanding of fault and legal liability outside any NDA,” said POGO General Counsel Scott Amey.

    Additionally, other government agencies have used NDAs to silence whistleblowers.

    “POGO has long been concerned about the use of these non-disclosure agreements in federal agencies and contracted companies,” the advocacy group wrote in August 2014. POGO sent a letter to then-Attorney General Eric Holder to “investigate federal fund recipients using confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements that infringe current and former employees’ federal whistleblower protections.”

    “Normally a NDA prohibits non-governmental individuals or entities from speaking out about, and have been a tool to silence company whistleblowers,” Amey said. “If the government is using agreements with contractors as a justification for the government’s withholding of information from the public, someone in Congress and legal and law enforcement offices should be taking a look to prevent abuse. Agencies shouldn’t mistakenly hide behind confidentiality or nondisclosure agreements as a way to prevent the truth from coming out.”


    Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

    Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

    Powered by WPeMatico

    Surge Wire

    Breaking news and analysis from around the globe courtesy of Daily Surge.

    Trending Now on Daily Surge

    Send this to a friend