• If Everything Else Is ‘Okay’, Why Not This? ‘Experts’ Give Thumbs Up to Adultery

    Daily Surge Summary: A major psychiatric organization has given its recommendation to adultery and other forms of “sexual anarchy”.

    For those few who haven’t yet connected the dots: the Secularist Left really isn’t too enthused about traditional concepts of marriage. They’ve been nibbling away at it for years, and have lately taken another chomp out of it.

    Charlie Butts, Billy Davis (OneNewsNow.com) report:

    The professional association that bowed to pressure from homosexual activists during the 1970s is now advocating adultery among married couples.

    Is that a gasp I hear? Why is that? The culture that has buckled before the proposition that homosexual sodomy is healthy, that matrimony can involve two dudes saying “I do” to one another, can’t realistically be expected to man the ramparts for the sanctity of natural (i.e. authentic) marriage.

    Laurie Higgins of the Illinois Family Institute (IFI) advises,

    no one should ever consider the American Psychological Association [APA] a legitimate source again, citing the push for “consensual non-monogamy” from a group of lesbian and homosexual psychologists.

    Higgins and IFI, an APA group ominously known as Division 44, founded in the 1980s, formed a grave-sounding “task force advisory board” in 2018 that

    examined consensual non-monogamy in the interest of “relationship diversity” and has now released its findings.

    That, by the way, is psycho-babbling gobbledygook. Or, as Butts and Davis write:

    “Consensual non-monogamy” is professional euphemism for adultery and infidelity.

    Reading from the task force’s conclusions, Higgins tells OneNewsNow the LGBT group aims to promote “awareness and inclusivity” about what it calls “diverse expressions” of intimate relationships.

    (What’s with Progressives and these denatured euphemisms, anyway? An unborn baby is a “fetus”; an abortion a “menstrual extraction”; “gender dysphoria” is “transgenderism”; allowing workers to keep the money they earned is a “tax hike”. Adultery? “inclusivity”, “diverse expressions”, “consensual non-monogamy”. Hoo-boy.)

    Back to Division 44 task force babble: What it labels “diverse expressions” of intimate relationships

    include but are not limited to people who practice polyamory, open relationships, swinging relationship anarchy and other types of ethical non-monogamous relationships.

    “Relationship anarchy”? Doesn’t “anarchy” usually connote bad stuff? Merriam-Webster defines it, in part: “Absence of order; disorder”. Toss intimate personal/sexual interaction into the mix, and what could possibly go wrong?

    Such a liberal perspective of sex and relationships was a long time coming: Recall, when the American Psychiatric Association bowed to pressure to erase homosexuality from its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in the 1970s, the similarly named American Psychological Association was in agreement. (Same-sex attraction had been included as a mental disorder in the very first DSM published in 1952.)

    According to the homosexual lobbying group Human Rights Campaign, that change brought about a broader change, “help[ing] shift public opinion, marking a major milestone for LGBTQ equality.”

    Thus, here we are, four decades on, and the “experts” have apparently decided it’s time to freshly deploy their societal wrecking ball as

    university professors, licensed therapists, activists, and writers … defend and legitimize polyamory. …

    Higgins says Division 44 is using the same tactics used in the 1970s, and most recently for transgenders, which is to claim people who oppose its views are bigoted and ignorant.

    She emphasizes Division 44’s just minted offerings do nothing less than

    open the door to the destruction of the traditional family and to marriages in particular.

    Of course, that pernicious destruction has been at work for many years and too many of the “professionals” have greased the skids for it with lofty-sounding rhetoric all along. Like every incremental step of this diabolical cycle, this explicit and official promotion of consensual non-monogamyis, in fact, just another shovelful atop the pile of family-eradicating, civilization-eroding twaddle.

    Image: Adapted from Mihai Paraschiv from Pixabay 


    Trending Now on Daily Surge

    Send this to a friend